Integrator and recorder



Dec. 16, 1930. I M. MORRISON 1,785,525

INTEGRATOR AND RECORDER Original Filed Oct. 8, 1923 5 Sheets-Sheet 1 Dec. 16, 1930. MQRRISON 1,785,525

INTEGRATOR AND RECORDER Original led Oct. 8, 1923 5 Sheets-Sheet 2 Dec. 16, 1930. i I MORRISON 1,785,525

' INTEGRATOR AND RECORDER Original Filed Oct. 8; 1923 5 Sheets-Sheet '5 I IIIII jfilgllllllllllll lll lll ll 17 71 I/YU/Y DIFFERENCE 0! IWWLU X 2 Dec. 16, 1930. M. MQRRISON 1,785,525

INTEGRATOR AND RECORDER I Original Filed Oct. 8, 1923 S She'etS-Sheet 4 jnuen/if Dec. 16, 1930.

M. MORRISON INTEGRATOR AND RECORDER al Filed 8, 1925 5 sneets sneen 5 Patented Dec. 16, 1930 PATENT, OFFICE Momronn monnrson, or'omoaoo, rumors INTEGRATOR AND RECORDER Original application filed October 8, 1928, Serial No. 667,887. Divided and this application filed. October 22, 1828. Serial No. 814,187.

This application is a division of my prior application Serial Number 667 ,397 filed 00-- tober 8:1923.

This invention relates to instruments for integrating, recording and indicating the flow of fluids.

Among the objects of my invention are: to provide a generally improved means of integrating, recordin and indicating the measure of the flow o gases and liquic s; to provide greater accuracy in the functioning of the several component parts; to provide greater permanency in the calibration of said several parts.

I provide a class, novel in this art, of electric construction and circuits for theintegrating, recording and indicating of my manometer measurements, the performance of which comprise methods which are independent of voltage, frequency and wave form, and are deflection methods depending purely upon the relative resistance, inductance and capacity of divided circuits, thus producing a flow meter which operates upon a construction which is fundamentally accurate and not upon compromised approXi-. mations.

To illustrate the scope of my flowmeter inv'ention as related to my electrical instruments and circuits, I shall show three different forms of each instrument and demonstrate that my improvements lie within a class of construction rather than in any one example.

Among the objects of my integrator are first, to provide a true means and a fundamentally correct construction for the actual integration of themanometer performance; second, to provide an electrical integrating means which is entirely independent of electrical conditions of voltage, frequency and wave form; third, to provide high-torque at all readings and thereby improve the light load accuracy, as well as maintain the full load accuracy.

Among the objects of my recorder are; first, to provide accurate readings independent of the excitin'gvoltage, frequency and wave form; second. to provide high-torque throughout the entire scale; third, to have a greater spread of scale on the parts of the scale where the errors are likely to be highest; fourth, to provide a construction that does not require springs in its operation; fifth, to provide an accurate timing mechanism which may be operated-from the line voltage.

Other and further objects will be in part pointed out and in part obvious in the reading of the specification and upon careful inspection of the drawings but the spirit and substance of my invention is more fully described in the appended claims.

Reference may now be made to the drawings in which, Fig. 1 considered jointly with Fig. 4, constitute a diagrammatical sketch of one embodiment of my invention and-in which the elements have been so modified, rearranged and simplified to general explanatory essentials, as is thought best to clearly present the differentiating characteristics of my invention in such a manner as would enable one skilled in the art to make and use my invention.

Figs. 2 and 3 are details of the embodiments of the velocity modifier and dynamic pressure tubes of Fig. 1.

Fig. 5 is a general cross-section of the manometer shown in elevation in Fig. 1 and Figs. 6, 7 and 8 are construction details of Fig. 5 and will serve to illustrate method of making same.

Figs. 9 and 10 are different elevations of some of the elements of the integrator shown in 4,the parts being modified, rearranged and simplified for clearness, as in an actual integrator, the relative proportions of the .parts and their compact disposition together with the supporting structure, do not lend themselves readily to easy conception and comprehension.

Fig. 11 is an elevation of the recording dials of integrator shown in Fig. 9.

Figs. 12 and 13 show a second embodiment of my invention in the form of an integrator combined with a recorder and an indicator and having a single electric circuit element, all of which are widely different mechanically from the construction shown in the embodi. ment illustrated in the preceding figures,

though entirely within the scope of my invention as set forth in the appended clalms.

Fig. 14 is a detail of the armature and field construction of the electric-circuit element of Fig. 12.

Fig. 15 shows a third embodiment of in- Vention with particular reference to the electrical elements and circuits of my instruments and in the particular form shown represents a flow indicator, thou 11 this same element may be used in any of t e instruments shown in Fig. 4, in place of the electrical elements illustrated in that figure.

It was shown by Raleigh in 1876 that the dynamic pressure, exerted upon such a device as a Pitot tube by the velocity of a compress1- ble fluid, is entirely different and follows a different law from that of a non-compresslble fluid. However, Raleigh pointed out that under certain conditions of flow the law of the dynamic pressure of the compressible fluid is substantially that of the non-compressible fluid.

In my invention, I provide such a construction as will, where possible, reduce the aver age velocity of flow to Within limits where this dynamic pressure more nearly obeys the simple laws of non-compressible fluids for gaseous fluids.

Of course this modification may not be necessary in the case of non-compressible fluids, but this aforementioned relation as pointed out by Raleigh is very complex, and does not lend itself readily to commercial metering. So that in the cases where compressible fluids, such as gas, steam and air, are to be metered, and further where possible, I employ a mechanical construction in the vicinity of my dynamic pressure tubes such as will reduce the velocity of flow by these said tubes, to within, at least, such a limit as will increase the accuracy of the dynamic pressure indicated, as related to the velocity of flow.

In constructing such a means for reducing the said velocity of flow, I may at the same time give'such increased cross section through my metering device as will not add substantially to the pressure drop due to my device over that present in the absence of said device. In other words, with the construction employed, I need not necessarily have a greater pressure drop in that part of my instrument which I insert into the pipe line, over that pressure drop inherently present, due to the normal piping in the absence of I the said instrument.

I also provide in that part of my instrument which is inserted into the line of flow, one or more stages of the velocity distribution modifiers, which cause the velocities across the section of the line of flow to be more evenly distributed than without the said modifiers, so that when the stream lines reach my dynamic pressure tubes to have their velocities recorded, the variations in velocities have been considerably reduced, and the average velocity more nearly corresponds to the maximum, and further, all the velocities are of such a magnitude as lend themselves to more accurate dynamic-pressure-velocity relations.

Further, I prefer to employ forms ofdyw namic pressure tubes which tend to maintain the stream lines of flow in their modified directions and magnitude, rather than disturb them, so that the fluids in passing my dynamic pressure device do not have their direction or magnitude substantially modified, thus again increasing the accuracy of my device.

In my flow meter I provide a novel form of integrator, which belongs to a class of constructions as related to this art, rather than to a specific mechanical construction, and I submit two widely different embodiments to illustrate this point.

In the first embodiment, I employ a timing mechanism which constitutes a shaft, driven at a definite, constant speed, as related to time, and which shaft is connected to a means of recording its revolutions by a gear system which has for its ratio the instantaneous velocity of the fluid to be metered.

In general, in my invention, I employ two electric fields, which react, one upon the other, in such a way as to serve as a means of integrating, recording or indicating the fluid flow by pure virtue of the relative arrangements of the fields, and independent of their intensities. That is to say, I provide a class of constructions which accomplish the aforementioned results independently of field intensity, and solely by the relation of one field to the other, or in shorter language, the field circuits are so constructed and operated that the results produced are proportional to one field intensity divided by the other, and independently of their numerical magnitude.

By employing such a principle, it is obvious to those skilled in the art that the resultsaccomplished by such a construction are entirely independent of the voltage impressed upon it, or whether this voltage be direct or alternating, and if alternating, what the frequency be, or wave form, provided that one field be supplied through a circuit which acts as a reference for the-circuit through which the other field is supplied, and further that these two circuits are similar, electrically.

In a case of embodiment in which the resistance, inductance or capacity .of the meter element itself be not an influencing portion of the entire circuit, it is immaterial what the characteristics of the other parts of the electric circuit be, provided the two circuits compared are similarly responsive to electrical conditions.

In the first embodiment of m instrument, I employ for the electrical e ements used two co-operating fields used in conjunction relative intensities might vary considerably,

due to line fluctuations, and the like, the position of rest of the armature for any particular relative current is not changed. Such a form of device is applicable to all three types of instruments, as will be brought out and set forth in this specification in the description of the particular embodiment involved.

The utilization of such a principle in a recorder and indicator is obviously advantageous to those skilled in the art, for since such an instrument may, because it operates independent of field strength, work in very intense fields at all times and the indications may be made very accurate on the lower part of the scale which is not true of the common forms of instruments employed in the flow. meter art.

The scales of the recorder and indicator may be spread out on the first part and crowded on the last part, in contradistinction to the others used in the art, which are crowded on the low part of the scale andspread out on the high part of the scale. Such instruments have very weak and uncertain deflections on the lower part of the scale, making them almost useless, for low read- %)bviously, such a device is independent of springs and the like, and does not have large temperature errors which makes them particularly suitable for the measurement of steam and the like, where the instrument may be calibrated in a cool room and operate under considerable temperature.

Due to the high torque of the instrument, it is entirely practical to gear the armature of the electrical elements'to a small pinion on the shaft of the pointer of the instrument, and thus gives as long a scale as desired, with substantially the same or different scale char acteristics depending upon whether I employ constant ratio or variable ratio gearing.

The great torque of such an instrument lends itself to very rugged construction, such as is necessary in flow meter installations.

What has been 'said about the indicator with its type of electrical element can also be said about the recorder.

this instrument can be de ended upon because of this aforesaid abun ance of torque.

With reference to the second embodiment of my integrator, which also has combined with it a recorder and an indicator, I will proceed to show'that the characteristics of the electrical elements are the same as. that aforesaid discussed. This will be brought out in considerable detail in the description of illustrative embodiment.

However, it can be said in this part of the specification, that considerable invention is. required to produce a' motor element having sufliciently fine characteristics for this application, and although I provide a motor element the speed of which is entirely in dependent of line conditions which is the characteristic of an ideal shunt motor on direct current, it will be appreciated from a digest of this specification that considerable invention is needed over and above the existing motors in the prior art, in order to accomplish in a small motor a fixed speed depending entirely upon relative field and armature magnetic intensities and independent of voltage.

In the construction employed in this integrator I have provided a motor element construction, which lends itself not only to good characteristics on direct current circuits, but also usable characteristics on alternating current circuits.

Such a motor can be made relatively light, with a great abundance of torque. Fairly intense electromagnetic fields may be used and its speed is independent of loading characteristics. Unlike other motor elements used in meters of prior art in measurement of the flow of fluids, and which prior art meters had very little torque, and in which the speed was fixed by the damping arrangeill-3 ments, in general in this motor element, as

a matter of fact, it can be said that the electric fields may be more intense at low speeds than at high speeds, which makes greater accuracy possible at light loads, a second characteristic common to both embodiments of my invention, as herein illustrated.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the first mentioned meter element may be used as one element in a combined instrument as .well as the second embodiment-thatis to say, if the integrator, the recorder and the indicator have the same deflectin shaft in common, the instruments automatlcally become the combined instrument.

However, in the second embodiment I have illustrated such a combination diagrammati cally.

' In a third embodiment of my invention, I use a modified construction of the first/In the first embodiment of my invention, Which I will hereinafter describe in detail, I utilized two stationary electromagnetic fields, and in to right, and into the pipe line, I insert the a my third embodiment I utilized one station- 1 of operation and connection, and may give a greater direct spread of the scale, where a composite, movable field is utilized. Under some conditions of simple field adjustment and construction, a scale somewhat similar to the first embodiment is obtained; and with a composite, movable electromagnetic field, I obtain a scale which is more nearly uniform, being slightly crowded at each end, all of which will be fully described under the discussion of this particular embodiment with reference to the drawings.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that many different combinations may be made from the various elements of invention herein described and to be described, and it is desired to particularly point out that the elements in this invention which relate particularly to the electrical instrument and the circuits connected therewith, are more particularly and fully described with reference to their differentiating characteristics of construction in the appended claims, as related to the art of flow meter construction.

Because of the comparative simplicity of measuring noncompressible fluids and the more difficult problem of the metering of gas, and due to the fact that my instrument contains many elements which make it particularly applicable to the measurement of these more difficult fiuids, I shall confine the discussion and specification to the measurement of gas. But, let it be understood that any fluid is intended if desirable and applicable, so that with this explanation, it will not be necessary to bring all the classes of fluids into the specification, and only differentiating between them where it is advantageous or desirable for the sake of comparison or clearness to the specification, as the scope of my invention with reference to this particular phase is pointed out with particular accuracy in the appended claims.

Reference may now be made to the particular embodiment of my invention as illustrated in the drawings, in which Fig. 1, 1 is a gas holder, 2 is a pipe line conducting the gas from the holder to a distant receiver in the general direction of the numeral 3'; the pipe line as illustrated is broken at 4, and that part of the line which follows is considerably enlarged for clearness and is illustrated by 5. The relative size of the pipe 4, drawn on an enlarged scale of the same part as part 5, would be of the size 6, the flange and an enlargement similar to6 being eliminated from the left hand side of this figure.

In the figure the. flow of gas is from left part 5, which expands into a considerable greater diameter 7. This increase of diameter has the property of decreasing the velocities before they enter my dynamic pressure tubes, and in addition, I may bring the clear sectional area of the parts through which the gas must flow up to, or even greatly in excess of, the cross section of a normal pipe line, thus introducing the possibility of over-compensating for the extra friction introduced by the measuring device.

Also, this provides means for measuring the velocity of flow on a considerably reduced velocity basis, which I find increases the accuracy of a dynamic pressure tube measurement.

Beyond this expanded pipe part 7, on the down stream side of the side part, is the first stage of a velocity modifier 8. Fig. 2 is an elevation of the said part 8, taken from the up stream side thereof. This pressure modifier is of a cellular construction and in the embodiment shown comprises crossplanes 9, Figs. 1 and 2, and these cross-planes may be provided with sharp edges on their up and down stream sides, 10.

In general the area of the combined cells taken as cross sections in the line of flow are in excess of the normal areas of the pipe 4.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the resistance offered to the flow of fluids in pipes is proportional to some law relating to the velocity of flow, and it can be said, as a general statement, that the resistance offered to the flow of fluids in pipes over a great range of velocities increases faster than does the increase in velocity, and I employ a construction utilizing this principle in the velocity modifier 8.

With reference to the longitudinal velocities in the pipe, independent of turbulency of flow, which phase I will discuss presently, it can be said that the gas in the center of a pipe is moving at a greater velocity than that closer to the walls of the said pipe. With a construction such as illustrated in 8, the resistance of the flow of a fluid is localized, so to speak, so that greater local resistance is offered to a high speed stream line at 11, than one at 12, and if the flow at 12 be greater than that at 13, more resistance is offered at 12 than at 13 to the flow, so that the general effect is for the high velocity stream line to tend to flow toward the low velocity stream line, thus having the effect of equalizing the distribution of velocities over the cross section of the pipe. 14 and 15 are second and third stages of the velocity modifiers, and

struction illustrated herein does not represent the limiting characteristics of my invention, as I mightjust as well construct these velocity modifiers all in one piece, with lateral holes connecting the cells, or any construction which localized the resistance to the stream lines of flow, such as to make the local resistance increase with increased velocity, and provide means for assisting in the redistribution of these velocities when the said local resistance is offered to them. Further, in some cases, where the average velocity encountered is very low, I may so construct these velocity modifiers that after reducing a the average velocity sutficiently,the diameters in these cells in these velocity modifiers are such that they are below the critical value, as given by Reynolds.

When the stream lines of flow have reached the plane 17, they are in their final modified form, and are ready to be measured upon the dynamic pressure tubes. My dynamic pressure tubes are distributed over substantially the entire cross section and at right angles to the line of flow at plane 17, and in general are in line with the cells of the velocity modifier. With a large number of tubes distributed over the entire area and substantially in line with the velocity modifiers described, it will be appreciated that the stream lines are not disturbed materially in their directions and continue through these tubes intheir modified forms.

Unlike the dynamic pressure tubes of the prior art, I conduct the fluid through the tubes and may have the dynamic pressure tap open substantially within the pipe line 1tself. It will be appreciated with such construction that the flow is integrated over the entire cross section, at right angles to the longitudinal direction of flow. Independently of whether great uniformity of velocity is obtained or not, the reading of the dynamic pressure tap is much more accurate than .with tubes in the prior art which at the best only take into account openings in a line across the direction of flow. A dynamic pressure tap is shown at 18, and the tubes through which the fluid flows are shown in section 19 and in elevation at 20, and an up-stream elevation of the dynamic pressure tubes is shown in Figure 3, and therein is shown their approximate location and general distribution.

In my invention I have provided two static pressure taps, one at 21 and one at 22. It

will be appreciated that the static pressure recorded at tap 21 includes all the drop in head due to that of the entrance of the pipe 22 at the gas holder 1, the friction in the pipe line 2, the loss due to the elbow and various other conditions which may be peculiar to the particular construction of pipe line used, and it is at once apparent that it will be impossible to take similarly calibrated meters and expect them to read correctly on all pipe lines. This explains the apparently heretofore inexplicable reason why similarly calibrated meters should read differently on different pipe lines. a 1

I also provide valves 23 and 24, which allows me to utilize either static pressure tap I desire. In the utilization of the static pressure tap at 22, or at least one further disposed upstream than tap 21, I eliminate substantially all errors introduced into the instrument due to pipe line losses.

However, I appreciate that-it is not always practical or desirable to make a static pressure tap at 22, or even remotely disposed from the dynamicpressure tap along the rip-stream line of the plpe, and for this reason I have also provided the pressure tap at 21, which is the usual practice. Pipe 25 is the dynamic pressure connection for the manometer 27, and pipe 26 is the static pressure connection for the said manometer. In this description and specification of the instrument, the ap-. plicant has purposely omitted some details, such as means for taking care of gas condensation and the like, as such means are not an essential element in this invention. It is believed that such a detail and such similar small details would add nothing to the value of the specification.

Referring to .Figure 5, I will discuss the principalelements of the manometer 27 of Figure 1'. In the embodiment of my manometer invention herein .illustrated, I provide a general metal casing 27, which encloses substantially the entire device; 25 is the dynamic pressure inlet, which communicates the said pressure to the chamber 28, which is partly filled with some liquid such as mercury 29. 26 is the static pressure inlet to the manometer, which communicates the said pressure to the space above the mercury level 31. In the case of some fluids to be measured, this space may be filled with an insulating fluid, which protects the electrical elements therein contained and hereinafted described. The mercury level on the static pressure side of the manometer is indicated by the line 31, as before referred to. The communication between dynamic and static pressure chambers is preferably restricted to a small opening, such as indicated at 32. This small opening-construction prevents the mercury from being transferred from one chamber to another with any great degree of rapidity,

which has the effect of dampening out oscillations in the differential mercurycolumn, due to pulsations in the flow of the fluid to be measured.

In the'opening 32, is located a double acting check valve 33, which is held in a neutral position by means of spring 34, and should there be a tendency for the sudden rise of mercury in either direction through the opening 32, of sufiioient magnitude to force the mercury beyond its normal working limit,

the double acting check valve 33 closes the opening until pressure has been removed,

thus tending to prevent the mercury from being blown out under certain conditions in practice.

In the embodiment, illustrated herein, of manometer, I provide an immersible coil of wire 35, which has its several turns short circuited by the rise of mercury in the chamber above 31, by the rise in level of the mercury or other liquid at 31.

I may provide my manometer with an insulated bushing 36, which serves as an insulated electrical connection from the thumbnut at 36 to the beginning of the resistance coil 37. The resistance coil beginning at 37 is wound spirally and helically around a surface of revolution according to certain laws hereinafter described, and ending at the point 38. My resistance coil is so constructed that as the mercurv rises in the chamber 30 due to the differential pressure in the manometer, as the said mercury short circuits the turns in the coil 35, the remaining unshort-circuited turns have an electrical conductivity which, when referred to a standard is proportional to the velocity of flow in the pig: line 4.

athematically, there are several Ways of arriving at the dimensions of such a coil .of wire, and two of which I will explain herewith.

Referring to Figure 7, the maximum pressure diflerence to be measured is indicated on the diagram by the legend, and it is desired to find the intersection in the w-y plane of a surface of revolution, which, when it has a resistance wire wound upon it will give such a length, to any remaining unshort-circuited turns of this electrical conductor, as will allow it the desired conductivity.

Obviously, the pitch of the thread 8, which constitutes the path of the resistance coil, might follow any law whatever, but in order to take advantage of standardization in the existing machines, I may use a constant pitch along the w-axis, in which case, I obtain a path for the wire, which when projected in the w-y plane, is the curve indicated in the figure for 8. Curve 1' is the intersection of a surface of revolution around which thread 8 is cut. I have solved the problem of deducing the equation for the dimensions of such a coil for any relation whatever between the velocity of flow in the pipe line 4, Fig. 1, and the dynamic pressure in the manometer 27. My result is represented b equation a in Figure 7. As I have hereto ore pointed out, this aforementioned relation may be very complicated in form, and therefore I provide a special equation from the solution of which I may obtain desirable values.

When the conditions of flow in the pipe line 4 are such that the square law holds suflimamas ciently true between the velocity of flow and the dynamic pressure, I may use equation 6, Figure 7, which represents mathematically the relations under these conditions.

I have solved this equation numerically, and print in column 0 the numerical values of the various ordinates of the curve. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the utilization of a surface of revolutions for this resistance coil is not absolutely essential, to come within the scope of my invention, as the cross section of this coil may have any form whatever, but the surface of revolution figure is used because of its constructive simplicity and practical importance.

Referring to Figure 8, it will be observed that instead of using a constant pitch along the w-axis, as illustrated in Figure 7, I may use a constant pitch along the intersection of the surface of revolution 1' in one of the reference planes, as illustrated in Figure 8, by the equally spaced lines along the intersection of the said surface of revolution in the m-3 plane. Such a construction may prove to be very useful in certain cases, an I therefore, give the equation for this form of resistor for any velocity pressure relation and shown on the line a, Figure 8. Line I) gives the equation for a square law relation between the aforesaid velocity and pressure.

Regarding some of the practical details in the method of making such a resistance coil which would be operative under the conditions imposed upon it in this invention, refer to Figure 6, which is an enlarged segment of the section at 39.

This spool 39, upon which the resistance coil is wound, has molded or cut into its outer surface an open thread or groove which has for its direction, dimensions, etc., those set forth in the equation given in Fig. 7 or Fig. 8, and intowhich the resistance wire is to be wound.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, that resistance wire is found to vary in actual resistance from lot to lot, and to take care of this, I select a piece of wireof a length and resistance slightly under that required for the coil. This wire is then grasped at certain places and stretched with a resistance measuring instrument in circuit and the stretching operation is continued until the resistance measuring instrument indicates a certain value, still somewhat less than the ultimate value required.

This resistance wire is composed of any suitable material with a slight coating of varnish insulation, commonly known as enamel by users of resistance wire. The wire is then wound into the thread of the spool, and when wound has a total resistance slightly lower than the ultimate desired value. The spaces 41, Fig. 6, between the wire 40 and the spaces 42 above said wire are combyoxidization or some other process, which gives a structure of resistance coil which is entirely embedded within a solid mass of insulating material, giving such an appearance in cross section as the lower part of Fig. 6. The superfluous resistance insulating material is removed from the resistance coil along the line 43, which is comprised of the wire with small flat spots, 44. The actual calibraton of the total resistance of the coil is effected by cutting further into the coil along the line 43, making broader surfaces at 44, until the proper exact resistance is obtained, thus providing a resistance coil embedded into a solid mass of mechanically strong insulating material, and calibrated after being wound in place.

The wires having only small surfaces exposed at 44 to the action of the mercury, entirely eliminate the short-circuitin of a turn due to the mercury otherwise adhering in the spaces between them, as has been experienced in the prior art.

To understand the principle of an embodiment of one of my integrators, refer to Figure 9. 45 is a constant speed shaft, which is made to rotate at a'substantially uniform rate by any means whatever. In the illustration, I have provided shaft 45 with a disc 46 which rotates between the shifting elect-romagnetic field at 47, caused by a set of damper windings used in connection with a coil 48, over a laminated iron core 49, such as is common practice in wattmeter art. This shifting field at 47 gives a fairly constant torque upon the disc 46, tending to rotate it. These several parts are also shown in Figure 10, which is a view taken at right angles to Figure 9. Shaft 45 is provided with an escapement wheel 50, Figs. 9 and 10, and an escapement 51,'Figs. 9and 10, which escapement is connected to a pendulum 52. It may be well shown at this point why the torque on the disc 46 does not have to be exactly constant. In any oscillating system, such as the pendulum 52, the period of oscillation is substantially,constant for small increases and decreases in the amplitude of the pendulum. The period of such an oscillating system-depends solely upon the effective mass and the restoring force, which tends to restore the mass to equilibrium. The damping effect of the pendulum due to the windage in the air, and the like, has no effect whatever upon the period of oscillation, and if this damping effect be proportional to the velocity of the swing of the pendulum and nothing else, it will serve as a means of absorbing the superfluous energy caused by excessive torque on the disc 46, so that supplying a pendulum with considerable damping losses, the excess energy may be taken up by the increased loss due to theadditional damping effect which is due to increased amplitude, and without materially affecting the swing of the pendulum. Of'course, I do not limit myself to any such device for producing a constant speed of the shaft 45, as will be appreciated and more particularly pointed out in the appended claims.

With this shaft 45 revolving at aconstant speed, we have available a definite time ele-- ment, which we may utilize as the time factor in the integration process of the instrument. 53 is a spherical segment which is free to revolve about an axis 54, parallel to the plane of the paper. The axis 54 is free to revolve about a second axis 55, which is perpendicular to the plane. of paper in Fig. 9 and which may be better understood by reference to Figure 10. The axis 55 when rotated, carlies with it the axis 54 which in turn carries with it the spherical surface 53. The shaft 45 carries with it the wheel 56, which rotates the sphere about its axis 54, at a speed dependent upon the wheel surface 56, and the sine of the angle theta, which will be appreciated by inspection of the figure. The sine of the angle'theta is equal to the cosine of the angle phi. Thus the speed of the sphere 53 about its axis 54 is proportional to the diameter of the wheel divided by the cosine of the angle phi. Atright angles to the plane con taining the wheel 56 and the axis 55 is the wheel 57. The wheels 56 and 57 are held against the surface of the sphere by the spring bearings 58, which spring bearings are shown in the right angle projection at'59.

The shaft 60 is free to rotate when driven by the sphere 53. .The speed at which the wheel55 is driven is proportional to that of the circle about axis 54 on surface 53, of the, diameter proportional to the sine of the angle phi, divided by the diameter of the wheel 57.

v The diameters of the wheels 56 and 57 are substantially equal. Then, in order to find the relative ratio of gearing from wheel 56 to sphere 53 to wheel 57, take first the speed of the sphere which is proportional to the diameter of 56 divided by the cosine of phi; multiply this value by the sine of phi, divided by the diameter of 57. The two wheel diameters cancel out, and give the relative speed represented by the sine of phi divided by the cosine of phi, which is trigonometrical ly equal to the tangent of phi. In other words, this ratio of gearing is proportional to the tangent of the angle phi, and the total number of revolutions of the shaft 60 is proportional to the tangent of the angle phi multiplied by the time integrating element furnished by the wheel 56.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in this class of mechanisms, that if I so construct and connect an electrical deflecting element such that the position of the axis 54 assumed by said element controlled electric current through manometer 27 is such a position that lBU the tangent of the angle phi be proportional to the velocity of flow in the pipe 4, that the shaft 60 will revolve a number of revolutions proportional to the total flow of fluid when the instrument is calibrated.

Well arrange my gearing so that I might use the sine of the angle instead of the tangent, or any of the other trigonometric function, as trigonometric functions have the property of having constant values for constant angles, independent of the numerical values of the sides of the triangles involved in these trigonometric functions, and my invention lies in the use of this trigonometric property, as will be more particularly pointed out in the appended claims.

Shaft 60 is connected to a gear train 61, which carries with it a series of dials for facilitating the accurate reading of the revolutions of the shaft 60, the said dials being shown in a ri ht angle projection in Fig. 11., both of these lieing very common practice in the art.

Referring to Fig. 4, I show-one means of accomplishing this tangent-relation result heretofore referred to. 62 and 63 are two similar coils of wire wound preferably on an elliptic core, and which coils are shown in the right angle projection in Figure 10. At right angles to the said coil are two additional stationary coils, 64 and 65, Figs. 4 and 10. In the combined fields of these four coils, is an armature 66.

Source of potential, 67, Fig. 1, supplies energy for exciting the three instruments of Figure 4. Through conductors a and 6, Figs. 1 and 4, is obtained current for the coils 62 and 63, which current is limited only by the resistance of the circuit and substantially only by the variable resistance 68, Fig. 4, so that the field strength of the coils 62 and 63 isa function of the conductivity of the resistance 68 and the voltage of the potential source, 67. We may speak of this field as a shunt field, and as will be shown presently, coils 64 and 65 are series fields. As will be observed from Figs. 1 and 4, coils 64 and 65 are connected in series with the other two instruments shown in Fig. 4, with the resistor of the manometer 27 and the variable resistance d of Fig. l in circuit.

lVhen potential source 67 generates volt age, shunt coils 62 and 63 produce a strong field at right angles to the direction of their winding, which is in the direction of the arrow 69, Fig. 4. Armature at 66 assumes a position such that its largest dimension lies in the direction of the arrow 69.

As the fiow of gas impinges upon the dynamic pressure tube 17 in Fig. 1, the mercury level at 31 in Fig. 5 rises in the chamber 30, the mercury coming into contact with the wire at 39 and at 35 and the like, causes current to flow in the line 0, exciting the series mean:

' at right angles to 69 and in the direction 70.

The shunt and series fields combining vectorially, and givethe resultant field 71, and

because of the relatively greater permeabil- Let it be known here that I may just as ity of the armature'in the direction of its major axis, the armature assumes the direction of the arrow 71.

If the voltage of the potential source 67 rises, lowers, alters its frequency, wave sha e or constancy, the relative intensit of the shunt and series fields are unaltere so long as the shunt and series circuits have substantially similar characteristics, and therefore the angle phi does not change; even if the voltage of the potential source 67 be practically removed, the osition of this angle rew mains unchanged. owever, of course, in the absence of a magnetic field about the armature at 66, it lacks stability of position.

It may be well to point out here that there is no requirement that the potential source 67 be one of an alternating current, although it is diagrammatically shown as such. For the sake of simplicity I have shown the motive power for the timing element to be a phase shifting induction motor, such as used in wattmeters, and the like, and designated by 72, Fig. 4, and supplied with operating energy from the leads a and b.

The usefulness of the variable resistance 68 is extensive in the operation of the instrument, as it may originally serve as a calibrating resistance, and further, by the variation of this resistance, either manually or automatically, the instrument may be compensated for any desirable effect such as change in densities, pressures, temperature and the like.

Figure 4, 73 is a graphic meter, in which I utilize the tangent principle of the integrator just described. The electrical element 74 of the graphic meter 73 is exactly similar to the field and armature of the above described integrator, as shown in Figs. 4 and 10, the shunt fields of 74 being connected in parallel to the shunt fields of the integrator, and the series fields bein connected in a series with the series fie ds of the said integrator. The shunt field of the graphic meter 73 is provided with a separa rate calibrating shunt 75, which means that it may be calibrated or compensated independent of any other instrument. Onto the shaft 76 of the element 74 is mounted a common form of arm and stylus 77, the deflections of which describe upon the chart 78 graphically the changes in position of the stylus actuated by its motor element, as is common practice, and as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. That chart 78 may be driven by any constant speed device.

79 is an indicator, which has an electrical element 80, exactl similar to that of the graphic meter 73, ut in addition may have its ointer 81 geared to the armature of the sail? meter element in order to give .a greater spread of scale and a scale type more familiar in the art of steam measurement.

As will be observed, the divisions on this scale are proportional to the tangent of the angle, which gives a spread of scale at its beginning, permitting of better accuracy at lower readings, due to not only the visibility of the scale but also to the influence of errors at weaker field positions.

However, it will be appreciated that this type of meter element may have a very intense field, and in general at even the zero position of a pointer. Thus it may not be subjected to such gross errors as are found in the square law instruments. be noted that there are no springs required in the operation of either one of the three instruments illustrated in Fig. 4, and thus they are not subjected-to the large errors due to the effect of temperature on the springs, nor do they suffer the loss of calibration due to changes in the springs. The meter element 80 is similarly connected to that of the instrument 73. The shunt coil is connected in shunt with the other shunt coils of the flow meter, and the series coils in series with the other series coils of the flow meter. Element 80 is provided with a separate shunt calibrating resistance 82 for the same pur oses heretofore set forth for the shunt cali rating resistances of the other instrument. Thus it will be observed that I submit a flow meter having extensive novel improvements throughout its entire ,construction, and possessing all these requirements set forth ,under the objects of my invention.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art-that the reading of the integrator of Fig. 4 really is effected by a construction such that the speed of the shaft 60, ig. 4, is fixed by the relative conductivity of two circuits, or the comparison of two resistances by a deflection method.

In Fig. 12 I show a second embodiment of this invention, by the construction of which I may eliminate the timing mechanism and make the shunt and series fields themselves perform this work.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, that a shunt electric motor may be so designed that its'light load speed is proportional to the armature Voltage divided by the field voltage. Thus I present a sec ond specifically different embodiment of my invention.

In order to construct a small shunt motor having sufliciently good characteristics for this purpose, I prefer to make it somewhat special, and in the embodiment I have shown a field and armature, which are constructed mechanically, and would be electrically, similar; except for the taps on the armature for It will also brin 'ng out the leads to the commutator.

In 1 .12, 83 is a stationary casting to sup 4 'tator and 90 and 91 the brush leads. It

being a multiple field motor, the brush connected to lead 91 is not visible in the figure.

On shaft 85 is a worm 92, which registers the revolutions of the said shaft on the dial 93, as is well understood in the art.

Shaft 85 is hollow, and has a rod 94, fixed by a screw 95, and extending through said shaft. to a point 96 forming a bearing for shaft 97, of the pointer 98, Figs. 12 and 13. Ontoshaft 85, are fixed two permanent magnets 99 and 100, which revolve with said shaft, and between which said permanent magnets is the metal cup, 101, which is fixed to the shaft 97 and turns with it. Shaft 97 is opposed from turning by the weight 102, Fig. 13, which is suspended by means of a flexible band, 103, over a logarithmic spiral cam, 104, this cam having the property, that the distance of the flexible band 103 from the shaft center 105, is directly proportional to the angle through which the pointer 98 turns, this giving a counter torque to the said cam, 105, proportional to the angle through which it turns, which is the property of a spiral spring, but it eliminates from the instrument all the errors and variations dependent upon the use of a spring in such a construction. As the armature 106 turns, electromagnets 99 are taken with it, effecting the well known eddy-current upon the cup, 101; deflecting the pointer 98 through an angle directly proportional to the speed of the armature, 106. The pointer 98 is, provided with an indicating scale, 107, and a revolving chart 108 and a stylus 109. The chart 108 is made to revolve at a fixed speed by any suitable means, as heretofore referred to, under the description of the first embodiment of a graphic meter.

When the armature 106 is made to revolve, the number of revolutions are registered on the dials 93, the instantaneous speed is indicated on the scale 107 and a graph of the various instantaneous speeds is recorded on the chart 108 by the stylus 109.

Thus it remains only to be shown that the speed of the armature 106 is proportional to the flow of the. pipe line 4, Fig. 1, in order to complete the specification of this embodiment of my invention.

I illustrate a connecting board, 110, a common form of plug 111 and 112, showing different systems, by which this integrator may be connected. In general it may be said that I prefer the connection effected by the use of plug 112, which operates the armature in shunt and the field in series, though I may in some cases use the plug 111, which reverses the connection.

With an integrator of this type, the resistance values and the arrangement of the resistance, their method-of cutting in and out the manometer 27, may be adjusted and rearranged through wide degrees of variation to meet the requirements under the particular application and with the particular motor characteristics exhibited by the integrator in Fig. 12; and it is believed that the magnitude of these combinations is such that nothing of importance can be added to this specification by an extensive discussion of these factors.-

Figure 15 shows an embodiment of a slightly different type of meter element from that described in Fig. 4, and in this particular figure I have ap lied the meter element to an indicator, thoug as will be appreciated, it is equally applicable to a recorder, as well as to an integrator, provided in the case of the integrator a proper trigonometric function or combination thereof is used. a Referring to Figure 15, 113 and 114 are the shunt field coils, and 115 is the aforemen tioned calibrating and compensating resistance. Instead of using an additional set of stationary coils at right angles to 113 and 114, I provide two movable coils, 116 and 117, mounted fixedly at right angles upon the shaft 118, which moves with the pointer 120.

These coils may be connected in several ways. By the use of connecting block 119, the coil 117 is connected as a shunt coil, bringing the pointer to the series at zero position,

with no current in the series coil 116. The

current in the series coil 116 adds vectorially with the shunt coil field of 117, according to the vector diagram illustrated in the figure, and this resultant field aligns itself with the fields of the coils 113 and 114, giving the proper constant deflection of the pointer 125 independently of line, voltage, frequency, or wave form.

If the plug 120 be used, the current through the series coils 116 is made to fiow also through a part of the shunt coil 117, and the resultant fields adding, as before, vectorially, but with the proper proportioning of the shunt and series field strength in coil 117, the magnetic field in this coil may be gradually brought down to zero, and reversed in the opposite direction, thus giving a much broader spread of scale and one more uniform in divisions, if desired, being slightly crowded on the ends. This construction, however, does not give a tangent scale, and this property has to be taken into consideration when such an element is utilized.

It may be pointed out here, again, that it will be appreciated by those skilled in the various arts to which the various elements of this invention appertain, that many different combinations and separate uses may be made of these elements, not only in this invention but as parts of others, and the scope of the tric impedance element deriving current from said source and conductance values responsive to variation in the flow to be measured, a second circuit derlvmg current from same said source and having a conductance value independent of said variation, an electromagnetically operated measuring means having two electromagnetic windings, one in series with said manometer element and one in said second circuit, whereby the measurement produced is substantially proportional to the quotient of the currents in the above said circuits.

2. In a flow-meter, a measuring device comprising two independently excitable electromagnetic windings producing two magnetic fields, a source of electric current, a manometer having an electric impedance element deriving current from said source and in circuit with one of said windings, the electrical conductance values of said element being responsive to variations in the flow to be measured, a second circuit including the remaining said winding and deriving current from same said source, said second circuit having a conductance value independent of said variations, an armature cooperating with said fields and actuating a measurement evaluating means, whereby the evaluation of the measurement produced is dependent upon the quotlent o the current in the two said windings.

3. In a flow-meter, a measuring device comprising two independently excitable electromagnetic windings producing two magnetic fields, a source of electric current, a manometer having an electric impedance element deriving currentfrom said source and in circuit with one of said windin s, the electrical 1- conductance values of said el ement being responsive to variations in the flow to be measured, a second circuit including the remaining said winding, and deriving current from same said source, said second circuit having a conductance value independent of said variations, an armature cooperating with said fields and actuating a measurement evaluating means, whereby the evaluation of the measurement produced is independent of variations in potential values supplied by the said source, within practical working limit-s under operation.

4. In a flow-meter, a measuring device comprising two independently excitable electro- 1 magnetic windings producing two magnetic tions, an armature cooperating with said fields and actuating a measurement evaluating means, whereby the evaluation of the measurement produced is proportional to the quotient of the currents in the two said electromagnetic windings and independent of potential variations as supplied by said source, within practical working limits under operation.

5. In a flow-meter, a measuring device comprising an independently excitable electromagnetic field having a constant permeability characteristic, an electromagnetic armature having a constant permeability chara'cteristic actuating a measurement evalu-- ating means, an independently excitable armature actuating winding, a source of electric potential subject to variation, a manometer having an electric impedance element deriving current from said source and conductance values responsive to variations in the flow to be measured and in circuit with said armature actuating winding, a second circuit including the winding of aforesaid field, said second circuit,- deriving current from same said source and having a conductance value independent of said variations in said flow, whereby the evaluations of the measurements produced are responsive only to variations of current in the said armature actuating winding, caused by variation in the conductance value of said manometer element.

6. In a flow-meter, a measuring device comprising an independently excitable electromagnetic field having a constant permeability characteristic, an electromagnetic armature having a constant permeability characteristic actuating a measurement evaluating means, an independently excitable armature actuating winding, a source of electric potential subject to variatioma manometer having an electric impedance element deriving current from said source'and conductance values responsive to variations in the flowtobe measured, a second circuit including Winding of aforesaid field, said second circuit deriving current from same said source and having a conductance value independent of variations in said flow, whereby the evaluation of the measurements produced are non-responsive to variations of current in the ar-' mature actuating windings caused by varia tions .111 potential of the aforesaid source,

'member.

Within ation; v

7. In an integrator, a constant speed driving-shaft, a driven integrating shaft and a practical working limits under opervariable speed friction gear associated there with, whereby the integration produced at the said integrating shaft is responsive to the ratio of said gear under operation. 7

8. In an integrator, a constant speed driving shaft, a dri en integrating shaft, and a variable ratio driving means mechanically associating both said shafts. whereby the in-. tegration produced at the integrating shaft is responsive to the effective ratio of the said mechanically associating means under operation.

9. In an integrator, a constant speed electric motor, a driven integrating shaftgeared to a plurality of totalizing Wheels, a variable ratio driving means mechanically associated with said motor and said integrating shaft, whereby the totalization produced at the said wheels is the summation of the instantaneous product of the effective ratio of the said driving means and the speed of the said motor.

10. In a flow measurement device, a rotatable member the speed of which is responsiveto variation in the flowto be measured, a measurement evaluating means, a magnetic torque transmission gear operatively associating the shaft of said member with said evaluating means, a counter-torque member adapted to oppose in the said) means the torque transmitted by the said gear, whereby the measurement evaluation obtained by a balance between the torque transmitted by said gear and that of the said counter-torque 11. In a flow-meter, a source of electric current, a manometer having an electric impedance element in circuit with said source and conductance values responsive to variations in the flow to be measured, measurement evaluating means operatively associated with a movable armature, two electric windings magnetically associated with said armature and electrically associated with said element and said source, whereby the evaluations produced by the said means are responsive to variations in the conductance values of aforesaid impedance element and independent of variations in the voltage of aforesaid source within practical working limits under operathe relative strength of the currents in the two said windings and independent of the volta e of the aforesaid source within practical wor ing limits under operation.

13. In a flow-meter, a source of electric current, a manometer having an electric impedance element in circuit with said source and conductance values responsive to variations inthe flow to be measured, a measurement evaluating means operativelyassociated with a movable armature, two electric windings magnetically associated with said armature and electrically associated with said element and sa d source, whereby the evaluations produced by the said means are dependent upon the relative strength of the currents in the two said windings and independent of the total current therein, within practical working limits under operations.

14. In a flow-meter, a source of electric current, a manometer having an electric impedance element in circuit with said source and conductance values responsive to variations in the flow to be measured. a measurement evaluating means operatively associated with a movable armature, two electric windings magnetically associated with said armature and electrically associated with said element and said source, whereby the evaluations produced by the said means are depend ent upon the quotient of the currents in the said windings and independent of the product of thecurrent therein, within practical working limits under operation.

15. In a flow-meter, a source of electric cur rent, a manometer having an electric impedance element in circuit with said source and conductance values responsive to variations in the flow to be measured, a measurement evaluating means operatively associated with a movable armature, two electric windings magnetically associated with said armature and electrically associated with said element and said source, said armature being non-responsive to simultaneous proportionate increments of current in both windings and responsive only to non-proportionate increments therein, whereby the evaluations produced by the said means are independent of impressed voltage variation across said windings collectively.

16. In a flow-meter, a source of electric current, a manometer having an electric impedance element in circuit with said source and conductance values responsive to variations in the flow to be measured, a measurement evaluating means operatively associated with a movable armature, two electric windings magnetically associated With said armature and electrically associated with aforesaid element and aforesaid source, two circuits for providing said association and adapted to distribute changes in current therein due to voltage variation in said source between said windings in proportion to the currents flowing therein, and to distribute changes of current therein due to impedance variation in said element, by a predetermined and different proportion between said windings, whereby movement of the said armature is non-responsive to changes of voltage in said source and responsive only to changes of impedance in said element according to a predetermined proportion within practical working limits under operation.

17. In a flow-meter, a source of electric current, a manometer havingan electric impedance element in circuit with said source and conductance values responsive to variations in the flow to be measured, a measurement evaluating means therefor operatively associated with a movable armature, two electric windings magnetically associated with said armature and electrically associated with aforesaid element and aforesaid source, two circuits for providing said association and adapted to direct current through the said windings due to voltage variation in said source in accordance with the impedance of said windings and to direct current changes through said windings due to variation of impedance in aforesaid element in accordance with a predetermined relation with the impedance thereof, the said armature bein non-responsive to current changes governed solely by the impedance thereof and responsive only to current changes including the variation of impedance in the aforesaid element, within practical working limits under operation.

18. In a flow-meter, a source of electric current, a manometer having an electric impedance element in circuit with said source and conductance values responsive to variations in the flow to be measured, a measurement evaluating device operatively associated with a movable armature, an electric winding magnetically associated with said armature and exerting a pull thereupon responsive to variations in the impedance of aforesaid element, and a second electric winding magnetically associated with said armature and ex erting a counter-pull thereupon equal and opposite to the pull exerted upon said armature by first said winding for currentchanges in said windings independent of changes in the impedance of aforesaid element, whereby the evaluations produced by aforesaid means are independent of voltage variation in the aforesaid source within practical working limits under operation.

19. In a flow-meter, a source of electric current. a manometer having an electric impedance element in circuit with said source and conductance values responsive to variations in the flow to be measured, a measurement evaluating means operatively associated with a movable armature, an electric winding ma netically associated with said armature an exerting a pull thereupon responsive to variations in the impedance of aforesaid element, and a compensating winding magnetically associated with said armature and electrically associated with said source, whereby movement of the armature by change of current in the first said winding due to voltage variation in the aforesaid said element and said source, and a control circuit electrically associated with aforesaid circuit and adapted to counteract the effect of current changes in the first said circuit due to voltage variation in the aforesaid source within practical working 11m1ts under operation.

' Chicago, Illinois, October 20, 1928.

MONTFORD MORRISON. 

